|
Post by MagicalPwnyHorse™ on Nov 11, 2010 20:24:22 GMT -5
I dont play video games any more.
|
|
|
Post by kdogg on Nov 12, 2010 16:47:51 GMT -5
I don't know what system your playing on but I have MW2 and Black Ops for my computer, I'm running a multi-core processor, 6GB or ram and a dual GPU (SLI) ATI video card setup and Black Ops KILLS MW2 as far as graphics detail goes.
The attention to detail is way higher on Black Ops.
I'm running both games at MAX! every setthing. Can't comment on the XBox 360, my son has both of them on the 360 too, but I've not played them on the 360, I'm a diehard PC gamer.
|
|
|
Post by Miller on Nov 12, 2010 21:36:59 GMT -5
I dont know about you guys, but I liked the game. To me treyarc has made alot better graphics then infiniti ward. You get that gratifeing feeling when you blow off there arm or leg. MW2 didnt have as much gore as real war does, they also made the guns unrealistic in bullet proportions and damage power. I liked the presedent part of zombies, even know i suck at it . I was hoping a little better from the campaign but good job treyark once again.
|
|
|
Post by Legend on Nov 13, 2010 16:21:07 GMT -5
I love the game, but the graphics from MW2 are better, I think for as big as this game was supposed to be, you think they really would have went all out Agreed. The 360 and ps3 graphics are about as good as rainbow six Vegas 2. Its very blocky and cartoony on the consoles. @miller Clearly you have not played online yet. Online has graphic content disabled so body parts DO NOT fly. Campaign however you can enable or disable graphic content at anytime.
|
|
|
Post by Munster on Nov 13, 2010 18:42:04 GMT -5
Game Informer Magazine said:
"I would have preferred a true sequel to MW2 instead of Modern Warfare 2.5..."
But they gave the game a 9 out of 10, so that says something!
|
|
|
Post by airsoftsnipes97 on Nov 13, 2010 21:29:03 GMT -5
Ok munster, Game informer doesnt have a clue what their talking about then because it wasnt supposed to be a sequel to Modern Warfare 2. Its not supposed to even be based on a war. Its called black ops as in special ops. Its a game about all the unheard of confidential operations. Im a die hard gamer
|
|
|
Post by Miller on Nov 13, 2010 21:32:02 GMT -5
@ legend, I play online as much as i can, but that isnt alot becuase I only have internet at my moms house that I only spend 2 hours a day every other day. I think im only like level 12 online right now. Besides I buy the games for the campaign anyways. What I ment by more gore is when you shoot the dead body, dirt dosnt fly up, blood does. Treyarc has made some grusom call of duties.
|
|
|
Post by jager on Nov 14, 2010 17:31:46 GMT -5
I think the game is bad a**. But yes its the same as mw2 but new maps unlike the map pack for mw2 that where mw1 maps
|
|
|
Post by Legend on Nov 14, 2010 21:11:21 GMT -5
What game informer means is they were expecting different from treyarch instead of what seems like a suped up MW2.
|
|
|
Post by Kilroy on Nov 15, 2010 4:27:11 GMT -5
Id just first like to say that this is in now way, shape, or form...or even remotely close to a suped up MW2. This is a hole new ball game and in no way feels like MW1 or 2. Just to set the record straight I love MW1 and I think its the best one. I HATE HATE HATE MW2 because it sucked total ass but I wont get into that now. Just letting you all know before I review. I am in no way bias towards treyarch or IW. I am reviewing the game and its mechanics. With that said, here ya go. Treyarchs best thus far. Overall I think its a great game. The spawning is horrible but you can overcome it by being prepared for an enemy to be rebirthed out of your asshole. Love the customization options and the wager matches. Any old CS:S players would agree gun game FTW. I love the weapons. As this game is based on the cold war, you see a lot of russian weapons that are pretty much unknown or forgotten about. I like seeing new weapons instead of the over used M4 or any of the other super recognizable firearms. Some things need to be addressed though. It seems every time you respawn or the screen reloads, the textures need to reload and it takes up to 10 seconds to do so. While in the loading process, the textures look simply atrocious. But after the reload everything looks amazing. The game is fluent, the weapons are good, and the character customization is amazing. There is a little bit of lag when it comes to kills though. During the kill cams it seems that the player actually dies about 1 second after the last bullet goes through him. Thats a little annoying. The story line is EPIC!!! Had to add that. I wont go into details because I dont want to spoil it. Zombies are back. In the level "five", you play as the survivors JFK, Nixon, Castro, and JFK's Sec of Def. They say the FUNNIEST sh1t ever when your playing including JFK's quote "ich bin ein berliner" lol. Plus the guy who does Nixons voice is spot on and equally hilarious. BTW, Zombies are SUPER hard now. 3 words, Zombie hell hounds!!! Also, one more thing to add. Possibly the greatest thing ever to be added to a COD game. Theater mode. Being able to take sceenshots, video clips, and video of full previously played games is amazing. Getting a diving ballistic knife kill and telling your friends about it is cool but its much more fun when you can show them the video clip you made of you doing it in game. You can get some pretty amazing footage from theater mode. Examle: My buddy and me were playing and there was an enemy huey circling above. He tells me not to go outside but I didnt listen to him and I was unaware of the enemy helo right above me. I step out side and start taking fire from the helo. I ran back and DOVE into the building using that new diving mechanic. While in mid air, the bullets start flying at me and missing me by inches and slamming into the ground. It was the most epic near death my friend has ever seen and it looks like it was stolen right out of Die Hard. All in all, a great game and worth the money. Graphics: 4/5 Single player story: 5/5 Physics: 5/5 You can dive now Multiplayer: 4/5 Fun factor: 5/5 Controls: 5/5 Re playability: 5/5 Zombies and 15 prestige levels Respawns: -4/5
|
|
|
Post by airsoftsnipes97 on Nov 16, 2010 6:47:04 GMT -5
Great Kilroy, that was a spot on review. Perfect
|
|
|
Post by Legend on Nov 16, 2010 18:36:58 GMT -5
@kilroy you must have played it on Pc then. However I disagree with the fact that it is similar to mw2 in more than one ways. The guns, the physics engine, the spawns, almost everything. And I have to say mw2's campaign was one of THEE best ever! Zombies is the same as it was. there was hell hounds in WaW As well so nothing new there . And I still disagree that treyarch is best. After all I have played EVERY single CoD from 1 to Big red one and Infinity ward has always made the best out of them. CoD 2 was better than CoD 3 and people still play it because clearly its better. Infinity Ward makes great games and never will cease too. However when it comes to the community they dont listen very well. Personally since I have met fourzerotwo (one of the lead developers on the IW team.Check out his twitter) Iunderstand a little more why its so difficult to supply all this stuff even without a beta. For example for Mw2 everyone ( still) wants dedicated servers but for some reason IW still has not delivered. Overall, Treyarch is climbing the coolness ladder in my book with this game but IW has long kicked their butt in the COD battle.
|
|
|
Post by airsoftsnipes97 on Nov 16, 2010 20:16:22 GMT -5
But also be reminded of the fact that since IW did such a bad job on MW2 the four main directors of the game all got fired and had to make a new company-Sledgehammer Games, who is making the next Call of Duty
|
|
|
Post by Munster on Nov 16, 2010 22:01:14 GMT -5
I must disagree with airsoftsnipe on the reason that IW disbanded. Game Informer Magazine printed a lengthy article discussing the highly-publicized divorce between Activision and Infinity Ward's head men.
From what their article said, IW was attempting to steal the intellectual property from Activision for Call of Duty. They were an independent studio who was hired by Activision to create a game. But they got a little too big for their britches, so to speak, and Activision replaced the troublemakers with the Treyarch studio.
|
|
|
Post by Legend on Nov 17, 2010 9:27:38 GMT -5
Munster is correct. The only reason MW2 was even made was because Activision and IW had a contract where IW had to make one more game with Activision as its Producer.
|
|